Technology -> Data Management
By: Philip Howard, Research Director - Data Management, Bloor Research
Published: 24th July 2008
Copyright Bloor Research © 2008
Well, it's finally started to happen: the first of the data warehouse appliance vendors has fallen under the hammer, in this case with Microsoft announcing its intention to acquire DATAllegro. What are the implications of this?
To begin with it's really good news for DATAllegro. It should also be good news for the company's customer base which will now have a major vendor to support them and develop the product going forward. It's also good news for Microsoft, which will at last have a serious presence at the high end of the data warehousing market and a roadmap for taking its existing customer base (who should also be pleased) forward. In particular, I understand that the intention is to replace the existing Ingres database that powers DATAllegro with SQL Server 2008 so that DATAllegro provides a massively parallel platform for SQL server users going forward.
Conversely, it's bad news for Ingres, bad news for Oracle, bad news for IBM, bad news for Teradata and bad news for HP, all for obvious reasons. As for the other appliance vendors: they will not be too happy either. In particular, we now have to consider who can survive on their own, who might be acquired, who might do the acquiring, and who is going to disappear. As for the first question the answer is probably only Netezza. In the case of the second the only standout answer is that Sun is likely to buy Greenplum.
Do I think that Oracle, IBM, Teradata or Sybase is a potential acquirer? Well, certainly not Sybase, which announced its own appliance early in the summer and I don't really see any of the others being particularly interested though Dataupia might (and might is probably the operative word) be of interest to Oracle or IBM. SAP is a theoretical possibility but it seems more likely that it will wish to remain independent. Which leaves the likes of Hitachi, Fujitsu-Siemens and EMC. Hitachi already has a reseller agreement with EXASOL (Hitachi resells it in Japan) while EMC has partnerships with several vendors including both ParAccel and Sensage (an event rather than a data warehousing vendor but as it is column-based it could always be developed suitably). However, it remains debatable whether any of these companies want to get involved. The only other possibility that I can see would be if Vertica's support for cloud computing was of interest to the likes of Amazon (unlikely) or Google (now that's a scary thought!). So the short answer is that one or two more vendors might get acquired but otherwise they will have to struggle on on their own, which means that they are all under threat, which isn't going to help them win new business.
A further thing to bear in mind is that Microsoft has only just announced its acquisition of Zoomix, the data quality vendor. Now, SQL Server 2008 already has data quality capabilities built into SQL Server Integration Services so why does Microsoft feel the need to acquire another product in that space? Could it be that it is planning to build a high end data warehousing stack? If that is the case then it is notable that it has recently announced a partnership with Kalido, which has to be a candidate for acquisition, but Microsoft will still need a suitable data integration tool. The obvious thought might be for Microsoft to buy Informatica but in that case why acquire Zoomix given that Informatica has advanced data quality capabilities of its own? So, who's got an ETL (extract, transform and load) tool that isn't a data quality specialist? Well, there are various low end products around but there's only one that will support the sort of high performance you would need for data warehouses measured in hundreds of terabytes, and that's Ab Initio. Given that Ab Initio doesn't talk to analysts I have no idea whether it would even consider an offer but it's food for thought.
Whatever will happen this acquisition will certainly set some cats amongst the pigeons.
Posted: 25th July 2008 | By Phil :
Just like in the BI space, this latest round of consolidation will undoubtedly spur more...
I wonder who, if anyone, would be willing to invest in a hardware based solution like Netezza? I personally think the big vendors would be missing a trick to overlook them for this reason - disks only have a limited lifespan anyway, so the fact that you can't use them for general purpose storage is irrelevant really.
I also can't help wondering why Microsoft bought a company that has such a small market share... they must be confident they can do a better job of gaining traction in the installed base. I'm sure their new R&D budget would make anything possible.
The writing has been on the wall for some time now for the commoditzation of large scale data warehousing - MS are undoubtedly a mass market vendor, effectively now able to extend their offering to every SQL Server customer on the planet.
I'm sure Oracle will be reaching for their cheque books again soon... their RAC product doesn't really compare with the performance or TCO of an appliance does it?
The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.
We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.
Published by: electronicdawn Ltd.