By: Ruth Cheesley, MD, Virya Technologies
Published: 26th November 2012
Copyright Virya Technologies © 2012
Google has been tweaking its algorithms (the systems it uses to identify how relevant it's links are to the search terms entered) over the years, with a view to improving the user experience and promoting results that are more relevant and abide by their recommended guidelines relating to search engine optimisation. Two updates were released in recent history which have hit some sites particularly hard. This article will cover the Google update first seen in February 2011 and later rolled out internationally in August 2011 known as 'Panda' or 'Farmer', and the more recent Penguin update.
What is the Panda update?
Panda was first rolled out on February 23 2011 and hit many sites very hard. It was perhaps one of the first Google updates that made people sit up and pay attention to Google's recommended Best Practice guidelines <http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769#3>, and realise that some widely used practices were actually going against these guidelines. Up to 12% of search results were impacted by this update, which is a very significant amount. Subsequent updates are being made to the original Panda update, which further refine the original algorithm updates.
Panda cracked down heavily on thin content (pages which don't have relevant content of their own, but simply exist to push users to another resource—think landing pages, cloned sites, parked pages filled with adsense links, etc).
Also targeted were content farms, sites with high advert-to-content ratios (therefore more focused on revenue generation than serving relevant and useful content), and a range of other quality issues, including duplicated content.
Panda hit Europe around April 2011, which, for many business owners, was the first time they had heard about Google algorithms updates.
The issue with this update was that your entire domain was penalised not just the offending pages—so your 'bad' pages will drag down your 'good' pages if you do nothing about it.
An analysis by Sistrix <http://www.sistrix.com/blog/985-google-farmer-update-quest-for-quality.html> makes for interesting reading. Some of the sites hit particularly hard include wisegeek.com, ezinearticles.com, associatedcontent.com and many more. Most of the sites either focus in revenue generation from heavy use of intrusive advertising or are simply sites where people can post content which is often posted elsewhere and isn't unique or adding value—some even scrape content from other sources.
However, sites which focus on useful content with lower levels of advertising such as wikihow.com, answers.yahoo.com, ehow.com and more were promoted in rankings as a result of the Panda update.
What to do about it?
Doing nothing is simply not an option. Proactive, positive action is required to recover from both Panda and the subsequent Penguin updates. It will take time, money and effort. Recovery will most likely require a dramatic 're-examination' of your marketing approach.
Steps to resolving Panda-related issues
What is Penguin about?
The Penguin update was rolled out as the next major algorithm update since Panda, on 24th April 2012. Rather than addressing links which contained poor quality content, this algorithm update addressed sites which were not adhering to Google's Best Practice guidelines <http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769#3> relating to 'spamming'—whether this be through keyword stuffing, paying for inbound links, or artificially increasing traffic to a website. Google suggested that around 3% of links were affected by this update—significantly less than the earlier Panda update.
Penguin predominantly addressed issues regarding the 'profile' of links coming into your website. Google deals with a serious amount of web pages, and does an incredible amount of analysis on the links between pages and between sites. It has developed algorithms to identify what it deems to be an 'un-natural' link profile. Some examples of what may be deemed to be an unnatural link profile might be:
The Penguin update set out to address this issue, and de-indexed links from sites it deemed to have an un-natural link profile.
Ultimately, sites which have been affected by the Penguin update will have done something to artificially increase the traffic landing on their site, and Google's response to this is, at best, simply to drop all its links for that domain or, if you're lucky, to disregard all the link value which was coming from the 'un-natural' sources.
Steps to resolving Penguin-related issues
In conclusion, recovery from Panda and Penguin is possible, but it takes time and resources—and, in some cases, a different way of approaching the design, development and marketing of your website and/or your ideas/products. Good quality, unique content is becoming far more important than duplicated content across lots of different sources, and creating natural traffic sources is absolutely critical. Keep the quality high, manage distribution and get rid of poor quality content that may be damaging the rest of your site in order to move forward.
We have not received any comments against this entry. Why not be the first?
We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761