• Jump to Left Menu
  • Jump to Right Menu
  • Jump to Main Content
  • Jump to Footer
  • Accessibility Page
IT-Director.com Logo

 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS

  

Register For Membership | Member Login

 
 
DOMAINS
  • Business Issues
  • Channels
  • Enterprise
  • Services
  • SME
  • Technology
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Telecoms Tech World
    4th June - 5th June
    London, United Kingdom
  • CIMdata PLM Certificate Program
    10th June - 14th June
    Oslo, Norway
POPULAR PAPERS
  • FM, IT and Data Centres by Quocirca
  • The next frontier for managed print services by Quocirca
  • Beyond Big Data - The New Information Economy by Quocirca
USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Top Articles
SHARE THIS PAGE
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "Why don't you bore a hole in yourself and let the sap run out?" - Groucho Marx

PAGE TOOLS
ADVERTISEMENT
MORE FROM AUTHOR
  • January 2007
    Chasing the Holy Grail: the Algorithmic Arms Race
  • January 2007
    SWIFT's data dispute
  • December 2006
    Speculation on the financial services sector for 2007
  • December 2006
    IT presence in UK faces extinction as students shun sector
  • December 2006
    Hedge Fund Cloning Systems
  • December 2006
    MiFID: its cost benefit analysis and systems implications
  • November 2006
    Outsourcing of "innovation, industrialization and intimacy with clients"
Analysis

The voting may be paper based ... but the vote counting is electronic

Bob McDowall By: Bob McDowall, , IE4C
Published: 8th June 2004
Copyright IE4C © 2004
Logo for IE4C
Tweet

In parts of Northern England the electorate continues to endure the rigours of a manually intensive postal ballot (not to mention the complex postal voting forms) for the local and European election on 10th June. By contrast London will, at least, count the votes electronically for the Assembly, the London Mayoral ballot and the European Parliament elections through e-counting.

E-counting services are a quicker, and more accurate form of vote counting in complex elections. The e-counting services will be provided by DRS Data & Services (www.drs.co.uk), a Milton Keynes based company, which was awarded the contract to provide a full range of voting services to London on 10th June. DRS will deliver the results to this complex vote by the evening of 11th June, a process which would have taken at least 5 days if the count had been conducted manually.

The London Elections are complex. There will be a large volume of voters over 5 million in number. There are three ballot papers:

  • One for the London Mayoral elections: each voter has two votes, a first and a second choice.
  • One for the London Assembly elections: each voter is voting for two contests, one vote for the London wide party and one for the local constituency member
  • One for the European Parliament election: each voter has one vote for one party.

DRS e-counting systems capability enables multiple votes and different voting systems to be calculated at the same time

DRS specialises in high volume, complex and time critical electronic capture of data. It has both UK and international experience of e-counting, having provided e-counting services for selected county council and constituency elections in the UK and as variously far apart as Norway, Hong Kong and Bosnia Herzegovina !

DRS is delivering a full range of voting services:

  • 12 million designed and printed the ballot papers.
  • E-counting software which is independently verified to run three elections with 4 types of contest.
  • 300 DRS Photoscriber imaging scanners.
  • A configuration of 15 dual-clustered servers.
  • 250 pcs, 700 monitors plus projectors and screens.
  • Recruitment and training of 300 scanner operators.
  • Training 14 sets of constituency local authority staff on e-counting to man the 14 central counting centres
  • Technical onsite support at the 14 counting centres across London, including e-counting application suites ,imaging scanners, dual cluster servers (windows servers 2003), networked workstations, printers, hubs , projectors etc..

E-counting involves a number of complex steps. The ballot papers are scanned through specifically designed technology. This records the votes cast on the ballot papers as well as capturing the images of ballot papers, where there may be a dispute over the voter's intention. Data is stored in a secure environment on a central database. Barcodes are printed on each ballot paper identifying the electoral contest, reducing any possibility of fraud. Electoral forms can be electronically accessed and retrieved by the Returning Officer and Staff where there is a need for adjudication.

Is this a prelude to wide scale electronic election processes such as e-voting ? DRS is, incidentally, developing an e-voting solution (VotaPad).

Some of the advantages of e-voting are self-evident. Once the system is established It is easy to maintain and efficient to operate. Referenda and more frequent voting on local issues could be efficiently conducted. Vote counting is easier. It would be easier to initiate more frequent referenda and administer vote counts on a proportional representation basis.

The disadvantages lie primarily in the possibility that this form of voting could replace traditional voting methods, on the basis that is less costly and more efficient to administer. This could disenfranchise older sections of the population, but to whose Political advantages? It could be a prelude to some form of compulsory voting, as in Australia. Politicians of all parties are increasingly concerned about the growing lack of interest in local and national politics as expressed through electoral turnout. Compulsory voting would be easier to administer through e-voting.

Reader Comments

Posted: 12th June 2004 | By The Truth Seeker :

Has anyone noticed that each postal vote has a unique code that is identical on both the voting paper AND the declaration of identity (look at the barcodes)...i know this is supposedly to prevent electoral fraud...which is fair enough...but...it seems to me that having this code on both sheets is somewhat unnecessary (feel free to prove me wrong)....so...if the vote is counted electronically, surely this would make it incredibly simple for the government to keep a record of what party each voter voted for...and i dont think i need to tell the world...that is NOT a good thing.

Posted: 18th June 2004 | By jenjenjuloola :

the system described sounds perfectly ok, but what about that of the uSA where the electronic ballot system is underfire for its possible bias and the fact that it has not been independantly verified? if we continue down the electronic voting system route will we not end up in a a similar predicament? or is the UK parliament too 'sensible' and well structured for that? answers on a postcard please...

The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.

We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.

  • Contact
  • | Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy Policy
  • | Cookie Policy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761