Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Robin Bloor Published: 1st May 2007 Copyright © 2007 |
I received an email yesterday from the IBM analyst relations which read:
We are evaluating various forms of communication that would be effective, but also enjoyable and a change of pace. Could you please take a few moments to tell me:
1) are you presently a member of Second Life, the 3D virtual world?
2) if so, do you have an avatar (persona)?
3) would you be interested in receiving IT Analyst storage briefings in Second Life?(We would offer you a choice of Second Life versus standard briefings via teleconference.)
4) any additional comments
Margaret N Taylor
Senior Program Manager
IBM Storage IT Analyst Relations
My initial response was to write back simply asking the question "What makes you think that this is a good idea?" After a few moments thought, I decided to add a lengthier public response.....
Dear IBM
Let me first bitch about a minor detail in the email you sent. Question 2 is redundant. If you are a member of Second Life you have an avatar, unless (and this is unlikely in the extreme) you joined Second Life and found the procedure for creating an avatar too difficult. If you are trying to convince me that you are "hip" to Second Life, then you have disappointed me.
I do have an avatar. It goes by the name of Audacious Carbuncle. This isn't it's name in Second Life, by the way, that's its pseudonym in First Life (a.k.a. reality). I prefer to keep its Second Life name secret. No point in spending time in Second Life if people are going to know who I am. (Yes you can brief me as long as you don't know who I am).
Last November I published an article on Second Life which began "I was speaking to someone in the publishing industry who said they recently had to sack one of their staff. The problem was that the individual concerned (a woman) appeared to have lost contact with reality. She weighed 350 pounds, had become unproductive and had begun to insist that her colleagues referred to her by her Second Life avatar's name rather than her real name. The primary reason for her being "let go" was she spent too much work time in Second Life."
I doubt that this woman's Second Life avatar looked anything like her first life manifestation, but who knows, maybe it did. More likely it was pure fantasy. Fantasy and reality don't actually combine well. Haven't you noticed? Maybe that's why marketing folk are so enthused about Second Life.
The current issue of The Economist mentions Second Life and notes that ...
Edward Castronova of Indiana University estimates that sex is "a substantial portion, perhaps even the majority" of economic transactions in Second Life. (Users must first buy genitalia for their avatars, who otherwise resemble Barbie and Ken dolls when unclothed.)
Nevertheless, IBM, it's easy to understand your enthusiasm for Second Life and in some respects it makes sense to me. You recently announced a project that integrates your Cell processor (the highly parallel games chip that Sony used in the PlayStation 3) with the mainframe. Your rationale for this is to create a high performance hybrid that can handle the "virtual world" applications of the future. You clearly think that virtual world interfaces are going to proliferate and, sadly, I think you're on the money.
"As online environments increasingly incorporate aspects of virtual reality, including 3D graphics and lifelike, real-time interaction among many simultaneous users, companies of all types will need a computing platform that can handle a broad spectrum of demanding performance and security requirements," said Jim Stallings, General Manager, IBM System z.
The question I have is whether your coming mainframe will actually look like a mainframe. And if it does, will it also have a Second Life avatar that doesn't look like that at all, but instead looks like an iMac with a 24" screen that is coloured Day-Glo pink and winks at you constantly.
So what do I think of being briefed about your storage products in Second Life? Sure I'd like it, as long as the briefing takes place in this topless bar I've discovered in Second Life, where some of the avatars brief each other in outrageous virtual ways.
Meanwhile, back in reality, I'm going to start a campaign for real life. Let's not go down this crazy rabbit hole.
Yours Sincerely
Audacious Carbuncle
We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
1st May 2007: 'Daniel Mitchell' said:
Well...any article that starts with: "Let me first bitch about ..." Immediately gets discredited by me and most readers. An emotional start to a valueless posting. Your posting offers no value in either for or against Internet publishing methods in virtual worlds. You have a very sour writing style and you're neither fun to read or informative. My Second Life business has nothing to do with sex and is doing very well thank you. Enjoy what you do or change your life.
1st May 2007: 'Brian Regan' said:
I think you are way off the mark here. There will always be extremes with any form of media or entertainment, however, the positives far outweigh the negatives. Perhaps you should reassess your opinion and put on your emerging/futurist goggles. I was sitting at the beach bar on my Second Life Island with one of my employees from Chicago (I am in Boston) and we were enjoying a beer (SL beer is calorie free) as we discussed what was happening in the office, some point of procedure and a sales objective. It was her first time in Second Life. At the end I asked her what she thought, did you pay more attention to the 3D IM conversation than she would a normal 2D IM conversation, her reply was yes, the setting attracted her and she enjoyed the animations and discussion. The point is that there are many ways to use Second Life.
1st May 2007: 'Nancy' said:
I guess if the person is really ugly Second Life facilitates communication by breaking down psychological barriers.
9th May 2007: 'crazym' said:
Dude... you do know that you weren't actually having a beer don't you... It's an imaginary beer man...
11th June 2007: 'Brian Regan' said:
Hmmm, I guess my little joke about calorie free was not clear enough....
1st May 2007: 'jqp' said:
I'm glad one of us had the cajones to respond to that ridiculous request. Kudos to you, Robin.
2nd May 2007: 'AWI' said:
Not exactly sure of what you want your readers to take away from this posting, but the second question is not redundant. Anyone on World of Warcraft or There.com, or a variety of other virtual worlds has an avatar. Perhaps the question was asked improperly, but if you look at the population of people who have an avatar, only a percentage of those are Second Life users. You can even have an avatar for your yahoo email account. Perhaps you should respond again with an apology for your bitch.
2nd May 2007: 'Diva' said:
In response to AWI, I don’t see any need for an apology from Robin. On your point, the question was not whether he had an avatar, but whether he had an avatar in Second Life. (It was phrased ‘if so, do you have an avatar’, referring to the previous question.) Even if the question had been whether he had an avatar, or multiple avatars, I fail to see how this is in any way relevant to briefing Industry Analysts on IT Storage.
Personally, I found the article very entertaining and thought provoking.
The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922