• Skip Navigation |
  • Accessibility 
IT-Director.com Logo
  • When is an accessible PDF accessible?
  • Public VoIP for cheap long distance calls
  • Why I am interested in Open Source
 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • RESEARCH
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS
  • POLLS

  

Member Login | Become a Member

 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Carbon Footprint Energy Efficient IT Summit 2008
    4th September - 5th September
    London, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Managed Print Services by Quocirca
  • On-premise and on-demand by Quocirca
  • Data Migration by Bloor Research
TRANSLATE PAGE



USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Market Place
  • Top Articles
  • Hall of Flame
INTERACT
  • Advertising
  • About IT-Director.com
  • Site Feedback
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Registration
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Say Again? - "Water is composed of two gins. Oxygin and hydrogin. Oxygin is pure gin. Hydrogin is gin and water." - from Kids Say the Darndest Things

ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs > MWD

Is this really collaboration?

Angela Ashenden By: Angela Ashenden, Principal Analyst, Macehiter Ward-Dutton
Published: 12th September 2007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Logo for Macehiter Ward-Dutton
Page Tools

Tell A Friend
Contact Author

Recent Blog Posts
  • Businesses aren't machines, and enterprise architecture can't make them so
  • Collaborative mind mapping
  • IBM's identity management becomes user-centric: HP's identity management exit strategy
  • Oracle makes its "enterprise 2.0" play
  • A week of firsts
  • Which comes first: process or service? Part 2
Blog Archive
  • July, 2008
  • May, 2008
  • April, 2008
  • March, 2008
  • February, 2008
  • January, 2008
  • December, 2007
  • November, 2007
  • October, 2007
  • September, 2007
  • August, 2007
  • July, 2007
Syndication
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon

As part of a report I am writing on collaboration, I have been mulling over the increasingly broad use of the words collaboration and collaborative and wondering how appropriate they are in certain contexts. Let me explain.

Collaboration literally means to work together. As I see it, this necessarily implies that the parties involved are conscious of their co-involvement in the activity.

However, increasingly the term collaborative is being used to describe tools where the central value is gained by the participation of a collection of users—but where the individual users' contribution is not made in the name of the collective—it is made for their own personal benefit. For example, users of social bookmarking systems may tag pages for their own reference or to help them find things again—not explicitly to add to the broader network of tagged content. But, since there is no explicit intention to participate in the collective activity, surely this cannot truly be collaboration? Just because there is a collective benefit from multiple people using the same system, doesn't mean the people involved shared the same goal.

It may be that the term collaboration is simply the best-fitting umbrella for these tools and methods, but with all the confusion in the market over what is meant by collaboration—especially with terms such as Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Office 2.0 etc adding to the mix—I think we need to be more careful about how we describe emerging social software and services.

Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

14th September 2007: 'Dan French' said:

I agree completely. But I think it is even more confusing than you indicate. In my experience, the term 'collaboration' is used for three types of activity, unconscious collaboration as you detail, conscious collaboration (which can be either simple 'Communication' like a conference call, or something more computer mediated such as asynchronous, process oriented collaboration), and system collaboration, which is really system integration, as in the example of 'B2B collaboration' which is used to describe both system to system integration in the supply chain ( for orders etc) and conscious human collaboration through information sharing extranets etc. To make matters worse, not all Web 2.0 developments are neccessarly 'collaborative' to the consumer, mashups for example. Good thought provoking comments!

Reply to Dan French?

The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.

  • Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922