• Skip Navigation |
  • Accessibility 
IT-Director.com Logo
  • Breaking out of the social media echo chamber
  • Matching IT service with business needs
  • How to tag documents with multiple languages and scripts
 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • RESEARCH
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS
  • POLLS
  • MARKETPLACE

  

Member Login | Become a Member

 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Legal IT Show 2009
    4th February - 5th February
    Islington London, United Kingdom
  • Best Practice User Group International Congress
    10th February - 11th February
    London, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Content security for the next decade by Quocirca
  • IT Delivery in the Downturn by Freeform Dynamics
  • Agile Development - Is it Right For You? by Freeform Dynamics
TRANSLATE PAGE



USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Market Place
  • Top Articles
  • Hall of Flame
INTERACT
  • Advertising
  • Site Feedback
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Registration
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." - Groucho Marx

ADVERTISEMENT
MARKETPLACE
  • New Apple iPod classic 120GB - Black
    New Apple iPod classic 120GB - Black
  • New Apple iPod touch 8GB
    New Apple iPod touch 8GB
Blogs > MWD

Real-world Enterprise Architecture part I: journey vs destination

Neil Ward-Dutton By: Neil Ward-Dutton, Research Director, Macehiter Ward-Dutton
Published: 15th May 2007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Logo for Macehiter Ward-Dutton
Page Tools

Tell A Friend
Contact Author

Recent Blog Posts
  • On SOA governance: for SOA, read CPOA?
  • Are you capable of watching your technical debt?
  • The death of middleware
  • Notes on PDC: Windows Azure
  • Interviewing Avaya on Communications-Enabled Business Processes (CEBP)
  • Software Delivery InFocus podcast - ALM challenges and direction in the real world
Blog Archive
  • November, 2008
  • October, 2008
  • September, 2008
  • August, 2008
  • July, 2008
  • May, 2008
  • April, 2008
  • March, 2008
  • February, 2008
  • January, 2008
  • December, 2007
  • November, 2007
Syndication
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon

I was talking to Donna Burbank, Director of Enterprise Modelling and Architecture Solutions at Embarcadero a few days ago—she was briefing me about the company's new EA/Studio product. We digressed a fair bit along the way, particularly sharing notes regarding our experiences of how Enterprise Architecture (EA) actually works in the real world. A key point we discussed was the importance of focusing on EA as a journey, rather than as a destination.

It's all too easy to focus on the technical nature of EA outputs; which bits of the Zachman Framework should we complete? Should we mandate that all our models use UML?… and so on. Now don't get me wrong, it's important to get a handle on the scope of your efforts, and try and create some consistency in what gets done—but these things are means to an end, not the end in itself.

Where I see organisations spending a lot of time worrying about the format and scope of EA outputs and artefacts, often, perversely, it comes about because there's a lack of organisational ambition regarding the role and contribution of EA as a practice. The hole left by a lack of ambition here is often filled by huge technical ambition: "let's model the world". We all know what happens if you follow that road too far.

For EA practice to have a valuable contribution, it has to be prepared to prioritise conversations with business people (and less so with other IT people) over conversations with other architects. Although that's not within the comfort zone of every architect, it's critical. Real architecture has to involve real stakeholder engagement, otherwise architecture is just design with a corner office.

Why is it so important to prioritise "external" conversations over noodling? Because more and more, business agendas dictate integration, harmonisation/rationalisation and collaboration efforts which have unprecedented scopes. Business teams and IT teams have to work together like never before to make these initiatives succeed, and a key plank is to create a competency that can understand and drive the kind of global (as opposed to local) IT optimisations that will enable businesses to drive their agendas forward in the 21st Century.

In summary: in the context of 21st Century business, the critical EA competency is the ability to drive shared language and multiparty understanding—and conversations.

Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

28th May 2007: 'Brian Sondergaard' said:

It's encouraging to see the increasing emphasis on the architect's participation in the business. It's critical that the architecture team becomes fully bilingual, able to comprehend, influence, interpret, and instantiate strategy in both the IT and Business domains. I recently talked about this at a more tactical level in Architect as Advocate of the Business Brian Sondergaard

Reply to Brian Sondergaard?

The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.

  • Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761