Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Dale Vile, Managing Director, Freeform Dynamics Published: 5th November 2007 Copyright Freeform Dynamics © 2007 |
I sometimes think I am living in a parallel universe when I get
into conversations about Software as a Service (SaaS). People keep
talking to me as if there is some kind of seismic shift taking
place in the way organisations are acquiring and running software.
Then I look around me and down at the results of study after study
of buying patterns and investment plans that we carry out here at
Freeform Dynamics
and all I can see is the continued gradual creep of the price per
user per month hosted model that has been taking place in a steady
but non-dramatic manner for the best part of a decade now.
When I ask what it is that people are basing their evidence on,
they point to solutions such as salesforce.com and Google Office,
then at the number of column inches and marketing dollars being
spent telling us that SaaS is the future. And yet, beyond
salesforce.com finding an opening for a hosted service around a
niche application that is largely stand alone and sold into green
field environments (at least from a sales force automation
perspective), the evidence for the revolution is pretty
elusive.
Now before any of you SaaS evangelists write me off as a grumpy old
sceptic, I must point out that I am a big SaaS fan, provided you
approach it sensibly. Indeed, I have championed SaaS for internal
use in both of the companies I have had a hand in
building—bet my businesses on it, if you like. It is my firm
opinion that there can be little justification for any small
business to run email servers and the like in house.
But, I am also a realist, and the evidence I can actually have
confidence in tells me that I am unusual in my acceptance of the
SaaS model in a business context. For every organisation that says
it has SaaS on the agenda, there’s about 7 saying they
don’t. And those that are going down the SaaS route are
mostly doing so very selectively—they are not looking at a
complete shift in philosophy or approach as some would have us
believe.
So, SaaS is definitely a trend and this way of delivering solutions
will increasingly find its place in the mix but, in keeping with
the title of this blog, let’s keep it grounded and be
realistic about the rate of change that is taking place. Just
because vendors say it is exploding, doesn’t make it
true.
Putting all of the SaaS mania to one side, though, the individual
elements of the typical SaaS proposition are actually quite
appealing to many. Paying for software on a subscription basis
rather than forking out up front for a perpetual licence can help
with both cash flow and the optimisation of accounts (subscriptions
can be conveniently categorised as an operational cost). Having
your applications hosted on someone else’s servers can be
beneficial too, especially if this allows you take advantage of
robust and scalable platform technology that you would otherwise
not have access to. Finally, of course, having someone manage your
environment for you means not having to worry about the
distraction, cost and risk of maintaining the necessary resources
and practices in house—IT is, after all, a non-core activity
to most businesses.
The point is, though, that you don’t need to do all of these
things at once. If it is the subscription approach that appeals,
you can take advantage of this without having another party manage
and/or host your applications. If it is getting rid of the hassle
and overhead of looking after systems then there are lots of firms
willing to provide a managed service, regardless of where your
software and hardware resides and who owns them. Such services,
just like traditional hosting models, have been around for years
and are nothing new.
So, my advice to anyone trying to figure out where SaaS fits into
their IT strategy is to look at the components of the proposition
individually in the context of a specific requirement. If all three
elements—the subscription approach, hosting model and managed
services—seem relevant and attractive then SaaS is worth
looking at, but if only one or two out of the three appeals, then
look for the products, services and/or commercial terms that fit
your requirement. The bottom line is you don’t have to drink
the Kool Aid and commit your soul to the church of SaaS in order to
benefit from any of these things.
We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922