• Skip Navigation |
  • Accessibility 
IT-Director.com Logo
  • Breaking out of the social media echo chamber
  • Matching IT service with business needs
  • How to tag documents with multiple languages and scripts
 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • RESEARCH
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS
  • POLLS
  • MARKETPLACE

  

Member Login | Become a Member

 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Legal IT Show 2009
    4th February - 5th February
    Islington London, United Kingdom
  • Best Practice User Group International Congress
    10th February - 11th February
    London, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Content security for the next decade by Quocirca
  • IT Delivery in the Downturn by Freeform Dynamics
  • Agile Development - Is it Right For You? by Freeform Dynamics
TRANSLATE PAGE



USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Market Place
  • Top Articles
  • Hall of Flame
INTERACT
  • Advertising
  • Site Feedback
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Registration
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "I don't like food that's too carefully arranged; it makes me think that the chef is spending too much time arranging and not enough time cooking. If I wanted a picture I'd buy a painting." - Andy Rooney

ADVERTISEMENT
MARKETPLACE
  • New Apple iPod classic 120GB - Black
    New Apple iPod classic 120GB - Black
  • New Apple iPod touch 8GB
    New Apple iPod touch 8GB
Blogs > Judith Hurwitz

Why are Web 2.0 vendors dreaming about PowerSoft?

Judith Hurwitz By: Judith Hurwitz, CEO, Hurwitz & Associates
Published: 24th January 2007
Copyright Hurwitz & Associates © 2007
Logo for Hurwitz & Associates
Page Tools

Request Reprints
Tell A Friend
Contact Author

Recent Blog Posts
  • How much should you trust social networking information?
  • What's different about SOA two years later? Why we wrote a second edition of SOA for Dummies
  • The ten reasons why software companies lose in a losing economy
  • What's a Smarter Planet (and what does that have to do with technology?)
  • My Top Eleven Predictions for 2009 (I bet you thought there would be only ten)
  • Will packaged applications sink under their own weight?
Blog Archive
  • December, 2008
  • November, 2008
  • October, 2008
  • September, 2008
  • August, 2008
  • June, 2008
  • May, 2008
  • April, 2008
  • March, 2008
  • February, 2008
  • January, 2008
  • December, 2007
Syndication
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon

Recently I have been having dejá vu back to the days of PowerSoft. If you are old enough to remember, PowerSoft was the leader in making graphical development practical for the masses—rather than the object oriented gurus. Back in the early 1990s when PowerSoft’s product—called PowerBuilder—was in its heyday, it had been able to achieve dominance over arch rival Gupta Technology and a myriad of other long forgotten competitors. Ironically, at the time, Gupta had a much more sophisticated object oriented environment than PowerBuilder. But PowerBuilder was able to achieve leadership because the company found a way to make the traditional COBOL developer (and there were lots of them) very successful as graphical software designers. The secret was that while PowerBuilder professed to be an object oriented graphical development environment, it was actually a procedural environment that was familiar to the COBOL developer. Therefore, the skills that had made this generation of developers successful in an earlier generation provided the platform for a new career path in client/server development. Therefore, PowerBuilder took the market by storm and set the path for the early success of client/server computing.

Now, fast forward to today and the advent of Web 2.0. I am seeing lots of interesting tools such as Nexaweb, Jackbe, and Kapow. All these companies have a common strategy: they want to become the PowerBuilder of this new generation of application development environments. To create a rich, collaborative environment requires a level of sophistication that would prohibit less technical developers from participating. Therefore, just as PowerBuilder provided a way for the masses to create a graphical first generation environment, so this next generation of development tools will bring Web 2.0 to a broad audience. These web development environments provide the dynamic, stateful approach needed to create Web 2.0 environments.

I think that this movement towards Web 2.0 and these abstracted tools to support them will complete the picture of a service oriented architecture. The Web 2.0 environments will make the browser environment a full fledge participant in enterprise computing. Over time, we’ll see lots of business people creating compelling business services in this way focused on innovative, collaborative software that provides a rich client environment that provides sophisticated communications, as well as a stateful distributed computing platform. This is not an easy feat but one that some innovative players are going to grab to become the PowerBuilder of the Web 2.0 set.


Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

6th July 2007: 'C Keene' said:

Great column Judith! Allow me to throw another PowerBuilder wannabe hat into the ring - ActiveGrid (http://www.activegrid.com). One of our aces in the hole is that the founder of PowerSoft - Mitchell Kertzman - sits on our board and has invested in the company.

Reply to C Keene?

The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.

  • Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761