Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Dr Fern Halper, Partner, Hurwitz & Associates Published: 13th June 2008 Copyright Hurwitz & Associates © 2008 |
Several weeks ago, Hurwitz & Associates deployed a short survey entitled, "Four questions about innovations in analysis". Well, the results are in and they are quite interesting!
The Survey
First, a few words about the survey itself and who responded to the survey.
The Results
The importance of innovative technologies
We first asked all of the respondents to rate a number of technologies in terms of importance to their companies. Figure 1 shows the results. Overall, most of these technologies were at least somewhat important to this technology savvy group, with query and reporting leading the pack. This isn't surprising. Interestingly, OLAP data cubes appeared to be the least important analytical technology - at least with this group of respondents. Other technologies, such as performance management, predictive modeling, and visualization ranked fairly high, as well. Again not surprisingly, text analytics ranked lower than some of the other technologies probably since it is just moving out of the early adopter stage. Some of the respondents, from smaller firms, had no idea what any of these technologies were. And, in terms of text analytics, one company commented, " yeekes, this must be big time company kind of stuff. Way up in the clouds here, come down to earth." They, no doubt, are still using Excel and Access for their analytical needs. Other smaller companies were very interested in "non-cube" technologies such as some of the visualization products on the market today.
Those respondents whose companies consider text analytics or other innovative analytical technologies such as predictive modeling or even performance management to be very important appear to value analytic technologies, in general. The respondents stated that most of the technologies listed were very important. For example, when I examined those companies that viewed text analytics as very important, the average rating for all of the technologies listed above was a good percentage point higher than those that stated that it wasn't at all important. Granted, the groups were small, but the pattern was clear.What does this mean? I would speculate that it means that companies that have found value in perhaps one or more analytical technologies are more apt to try out others. Success breeds success. We've seen this trend in the text analytics space. When a company deploys the technology and finds success, other parts of the organization are quick to jump on board. These technology savvy companies no doubt are gaining benefits from these technologies and are willing to invest in them because they provide significant value to the company. Those that either haven't invested in the technologies, or are caught up in one problem -say getting their data into a warehouse- haven't had the opportunity to experience the benefits of these other technologies, for budgetary or other reasons and so they are not that important to their companies right now.
Text Analytics
Question 2 asked which statement best describes your company's use of text analytics? The results here indicate a surprisingly high percent - 32.7% - actually using the technology today. Again, the reason behind this is no doubt due to the fact that the companies polled are probably very technology savvy. I believe this is significantly higher than the overall adoption rate of text analytics, which Hurwitz & Associates estimated at 10-15% of large enterprises in 2007. On the other hand, almost 45% either didn't know what the technology was or didn't plan to use it in the next 12-18 months. It is important to note that these results were industry independent.
We asked respondents that were using text analytics or planning to use it. what they were planning to use it for. An important point is that the majority of respondents were planning to use the technology in more than one application area. Not surprisingly, Voice of the Customer and Competitive Intelligence/Brand Intelligence led the space with over 60% of the respondents cited these two areas. Next up on the application front was e-Discovery, an area that is starting to gain a lot of attention.
Let's slice and dice this a bit....
First up, those respondents deploying text analytics. These respondents came from a range of industries. In this group, companies are using text analytics for (in order of importance) Competitive/Brand intelligence, Voice of the Customer, e-discovery, quality and early warning and fraud. The respondents also cited other areas their companies are using text analytics for including spend analysis, analyzing company metrics, product lifecycle management, and mining business rules. Analysis of social media was very important to this group.
Those who were planning to deploy text analytics in the next 12-18 months also viewed query and reporting as most important to their company. Interestingly, the top application this group is considering is Voice of the Customer followed by competitive intelligence/brand image. This tracks with the primary research study we performed last year, indicating that Voice of the Customer should continue to be a hot area for text analytics implementations for at least the next year or so. Analysis of social networks and media was of high interest to this group. >
Even those who did not have plans for text analytics were still interested in social networks - indicating that companies are starting to think about using unstructured information to gain insight about customers. These companies may be considering brand monitoring companies to serve its needs, or perhaps haven't even gotten that far in the thought process, yet.
The Upshot?We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922