Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Dr Fern Halper, Partner, Hurwitz & Associates Published: 18th March 2008 Copyright Hurwitz & Associates © 2008 |
Data makes the world go 'round and a lot of this critical data resides in databases. This is why it is important to monitor database activity in order to prevent attacks and invasions.
I recently had an interesting discussion with Rani Osnat, VP of Marketing at Sentrigo Software about its database monitoring product called Hedgehog and its recently announced 2.0 release. For those of you who aren't familiar with Sentrigo, it is an Israeli/US based company, founded in 2006, that focuses on real time database activity monitoring and intrusion prevention. The company released its first product, Hedgehog 1.0, in 2007.
Hedgehog samples and monitors transactions using data that in the database cache. It uses the cache to minimize performance issues. The software utilizes rules that act on certain parameters such as time of day, day of week, IP addresses, etc. All of the parameters can be combined in Boolean conditions and operators such as "includes", "does not include", "between" (for a range of values), as well as AND, OR, NOT and nested expressions using parentheses. For example, a simple rule might be something like this:
If <certain user type> accesses <Credit Card Table> at <non-working hours> then terminate.
Rules can be developed by administrators using a wizard-based interface. Hedgehog also comes with a series of built-in rules called Virtual Patches, that provide rules to detect and prevent vulnerabilities in databases as they become known. Sentrigo maintains a team of security professionals that research and track these issues and provide the patches that act as a band-aid until the database vendor issues their own patches. These updates are distributed continually.
In release 2.0, the company provides:
I have had a number of conversations with database administrators in the past and I was frankly surprised that some of these administrators seemed to be more reactive than proactive in regard to monitoring their database(s). Many seem to be driven by compliance mandates, rather than taking a proactive approach to intrusion detection and prevention.
Companies need to think through their entire data security strategy, which includes attacks on data from inside and outside the organization. Perhaps attacks such as those that we've all read about in the past year and the addition of new mandates have opened their eyes.
Do you agree with what Dr Fern Halper, Partner, Hurwitz & Associates is saying? Perhaps you feel, or even know, different? Why not post your opinion on this issue?
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922