• Jump to Left Menu
  • Jump to Right Menu
  • Jump to Main Content
  • Jump to Footer
  • Accessibility Page
IT-Director.com Logo

 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS

  

Register For Membership | Member Login

 
 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • 24th Annual FIRST Conference on Computer Security and Incident Response
    17th June - 22nd June
    Portomaso St. Julians, Malta
  • Enterprise Architecture Conference Europe 2012 Business Process Management Conference Europe 2012
    18th June - 20th June
    London, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Data profiling: the business case by Bloor Research
USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Top Articles
SHARE THIS PAGE
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "She should get a divorce and settle down." - Jack Paar

PAGE TOOLS
RECENT POSTS
  • Would You Risk the Wrath of the Information Commissioner?
  • US Diplomatic 'WikiLeaks' Inevitable
  • NHS: Can we trust them with the Patient Summary Care Record Data?
  • Thoughts on The Queen's Speech
  • McAfee Update Causes Windows XP SP3 Machines to Fail Worldwide
  • More on the Exeter University Virus
BLOG ARCHIVE
  • May, 2011
  • December, 2010
  • June, 2010
  • May, 2010
  • April, 2010
  • January, 2010
  • December, 2009
  • October, 2009
  • September, 2009
  • August, 2009
  • May, 2009
  • November, 2008
Blogs > Alastair Revell

Data Protection Act 1998

Alastair Revell By: Alastair Revell, Managing Consultant, Revell Research Systems
Published: 27th January 2010
Copyright Revell Research Systems © 2010
Logo for Revell Research Systems

I suspect many businesses and probably most members of the general public are unawarethat the fees for notification under the Data Protection Act 1998 were changed witheffect from 1st October 2009. The change was made through The Data Protection (Notificationand Notification Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2009 Statutory Instrument 2009/1677laid before Parliament by Michael Willis, Minister of State in the Ministry of Justice,on 6th July 2009.

The annual notification fee has been £35 for all data controllers, regardlessof their size, since 2000. However, from 1st October 2009, two-tiers of fees havebeen in force. Essentially, small and medium sized-organisations with fewer than 250 employees or lessthan £25.9M turnover continue to pay £35 annually and are now definedas “Tier 1” organisations. All other bodies (including any public authoritiesdefined in the 1998 act) will now fall into “Tier 2” and must pay £500annually. I think the general public have come to realise over the last couple of yearsjust how important their data is and how easily it can be lost by cavalier organisations(including government departments!) I welcome the change in the fee structure provided the extra funds takenare used to increase the Information Commissioner’s capability to ensure allof our private data is kept more securely by those with whom it is entrusted and thatthose who flagrantly breach the rules are brought to task. Many businesses see the current fee as a stealth tax and I suspect a goodnumber of the general public too. However, I hope with the increased funding thatthe Information Commissioner will be seen to be doing more to actively protect thepublic from cavalier data controllers by everybody. These fee increases have been introduced ahead of new powers that will come intoeffect in April 2010 that will allow the InformationCommissioner to fine people and organisations that recklessly breach any of theeight principles that underpin the act. These new powers were introduced as part of the Criminal Justice and ImmigrationAct 2008, but will only come into force in April 2010. The InformationCommissioner will only be able to fine data controllers when one or more of the eightprinciples have been seriously breached in cases where the breach was deliberate,or where the controller knew (or ought to have known) that the risk of such a breachwas likely to cause substantial damage or distress; and the controller failed to takeaction to stop it. Hopefully, these new teeth will work in tandem with the new funding to ensureall of our personal data is kept much more safely.aggbug.ashx?id=a5f8a4a5-276a-424d-9c8d-31a8541accdf

Reader Comments

We have not received any comments against this entry. Why not be the first?

We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.

  • Contact
  • | Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy Policy

Published by: Electronicdawn Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761