• Skip Navigation |
  • Accessibility 
Virtual Worlds Forum, 6th - 8th October 2008 @ London
IT-Director.com Logo
  • SOA governance and data governance - separate or one in the same?
  • Ten things I learned about Citrix… and a little history lesson
  • HP raises the green bar
 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • RESEARCH
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS
  • POLLS

  

Member Login | Become a Member

 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Strategic Manufacturing Awards 2008
    8th October
    Düsseldorf, Germany
  • OUG Scotland Conference and Exhibition 2008
    8th October
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Keep Talking Not Spending by Quocirca
  • Remote IT Management by Quocirca
  • We are all IT users now by Quocirca
TRANSLATE PAGE



USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Market Place
  • Top Articles
  • Hall of Flame
INTERACT
  • Advertising
  • About IT-Director.com
  • Site Feedback
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Registration
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "The national sport of England is obstacle racing. People fill their rooms with useless and cumbersome furniture and spend the rest of their lives trying to dodge it." - Herbert Beerbohm Tree

ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs > Abrahams Accessibility

Standards must be accessible

Peter Abrahams By: Peter Abrahams, Practice Leader - Accessibility and Usability, Bloor Research
Published: 15th July 2008
Copyright Bloor Research © 2008
Logo for Bloor Research
Page Tools

Request Reprints
Tell A Friend
Contact Author

Recent Blog Posts
  • iPod Nano accessible and more usable
  • Non-accessible websites will be costly
  • Accessible website navigation pt3
  • Accessibility Conferences
  • Accessible website navigation pt2
  • Accessible website navigation pt1
Blog Archive
  • September, 2008
  • August, 2008
  • July, 2008
  • June, 2008
  • May, 2008
  • April, 2008
  • March, 2008
  • January, 2008
  • December, 2007
  • November, 2007
  • October, 2007
  • September, 2007
Syndication
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon

CEN, the European Committee for standardization, recently produced a report CWA 15778:2008 Document Processing for Accessibility. This report provides guidelines on integrating accessibility approaches and workflows within the document management and publishing process rather than as just a specialised additional service.

When it was complete it was realised that the report itself had not been produced to be accessible. One of the team working on the report used his best endeavours to improve the accessibility of the final PDF document, it was a significant improvement but still did not adhere to all the requirements of an accessible PDF. I suggested that this was not really good enough and CEN persuaded Adobe that they should create a fully accessible version. This has been done and will be available soon.

So far so good but it raised a bigger question relating to all the other documents that CEN produces. I would suggest that now this report has been published that CEN itself needs to abide by its findings and be an exemplar to industry. The initial response from the CEN publishing department to this idea is disappointing. They said :

  • To make all their documents accessible will be very costly.
  • Furthermore, it may even not be just a matter of cost. CEN has standardized on a format of Adobe with its Members because all 30 National Standards Bodiess need to have it. This adds to the problem, CEN cannot easily change their approach.

I am convinced that although both these arguments maybe true today they cannot justify any inertia in moving towards fully accessible documents for all CEN output.

Firstly I find it difficult to believe that there is anything in the Adobe standards used at present that preclude the documents being accessible as well. If there is then I am sure that the NSBs could be quickly persuaded to agree to any required change.

In relation to cost the publishing department needs to understand what the issues are and modify the processes so the cost is minimized. I am sure that CWA 15778:2008 itself will help them in that process. Everything I have seen so far suggest that if accessibility is built into the document creation process that there is very little extra cost, if any, involved.

I recognise that any changes in the process of creating standards will take time to implement but I feel that there is no justification in not moving quickly towards an environment where all documents produced by CEN are accessible.

I have also raised this issue with BSi, the UK standards body. The BSi recently ran a one day workshop on accessibility and during that day it was announced that the BSi board recognised the issue and intend to resolve it. I hope that as part of this process BSi raises the issue with CEN and other standards bodies .

Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

  • Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922