• Jump to Left Menu
  • Jump to Right Menu
  • Jump to Main Content
  • Jump to Footer
  • Accessibility Page
IT-Director.com Logo

 

Main navigation - go to a section of this website:

  • ARCHIVE
  • PAPERS
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSWIRE
  • BLOGS

  

Register | Login to Member's Area

 
 
DOMAINS
  • Enterprise
  • SME
  • Business Issues
  • Technology
  • Services
  • Channels
FEATURED EVENTS
  • Information Process Quality Improvement
    19th March - 21st March
    London, United Kingdom
  • Convergence Summit North 2012
    17th April - 18th April
    Manchester, United Kingdom
POPULAR PAPERS
  • Best practices for cloud security by Bloor Research
USEFUL LINKS
  • Last 7 Days
  • Archives
  • Top Articles
SHARE THIS PAGE
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • Digg Icon Digg
  • reddit Icon reddit
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon
CONTENT FEED

Sitewide
RSS Feed:

RSS Icon

What is RSS?

RANDOM QUOTE
Famous Slights - "Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny." - Kin Hubbard

PAGE TOOLS
  • Request Reprints
  • Tell A Friend
  • Contact Author
RECENT POSTS
  • Android: Ice Cream Sandwich Accessibliity
  • The accessibility bugs project - good start, more to do
  • Inaccessibility of mobile apps and ebooks
  • Animated gifs are a turn off
  • OneVoice announced a major web accessibility initiative at e-access 11
  • OneVoice Initiative to be Announced at e-access 11
ADVERTISEMENT
BLOG ARCHIVE
  • February, 2012
  • November, 2011
  • July, 2011
  • June, 2011
  • May, 2011
  • April, 2011
  • March, 2011
  • January, 2011
  • November, 2010
  • October, 2010
  • September, 2010
  • August, 2010
Blogs > Abrahams Accessibility

HMRC goes public on accessibility

Peter Abrahams By: Peter Abrahams, Practice Leader - Accessibility and Usability, Bloor Research
Published: 30th November 2007
Copyright Bloor Research © 2007
Logo for Bloor Research

HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) is the UK government department that collects direct and indirect taxes and pays benefits to individuals. This means that most adults are users of its services and this also means that it needs to provide equality of service to every adult in the UK. In particular it means that its IT Services should be accessible to people with disabilities.

HMRC has been aware of this requirement for a long time but was keen to review the situation and recommend improvements in the systems used and the processes involved in commissioning and developing new systems.

The latest stage in this process is the publishing of ‘HM Revenue and Customs, IT Accessibility Policy, Draft Equality Impact Assessment for Consultation’. To quote from the HMRC announcement ‘We wish to consult both externally and internally with both representative bodies for disability groups and individuals to ensure that our approach meets their needs and to receive feedback on how our approach may be improved.’

I bring this to my readers' attention for two reasons:

  • They may wish to send feedback as an individual or as a representative of an effected organisation (the closing date is 31 December 2007).
  • It is a good example of the processes and documentation related to an accessibility assessment. The structure could be used as a template for an assessment in any organisation.

Having recommended it to my readers I feel it is incumbent upon me to add my own comments and criticism of the document:

  • It is a thorough and well thought out document, it clearly describes the good and the not so good implementation of accessibility in HMRC.
  • The twelve golden rules at the end are a helpful checklist that will help to avoid many accessibility problems.
  • The document itself is published as an accessible PDF and includes a set of bookmarks for the chapter headings. Creating it in this format shows HMRC is thinking about accessibility at all levels. Having said that I would suggest some the following improvements:
    • Removal of redundant bookmarks (in some case two bookmarks point to the same place).
    • Add bookmarks for the level two headings (those starting n.m). By doing this the bookmarks give a very clear overview of the document and its structure (helping both understanding and navigation).
    • I assume the document was originally created in Word. It would help if the headings and sub-headings used styles as then the numbering would be correct (there are several errors in the numbering which certainly confused me; for example, there are three sections numbered 2.2).
  • The Golden Rules section is very useful but I think it needs to be preceded by some more general definition of principles from which the Rules could flow, see my article Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 latest draft. I think the WCAG 2.0 principles: perceivable, operable, understandable and robust (POUR) would be a very useful addition to this document.
  • The communication plan should be extended in two ways:
    • An accessibility statement (based on the accessibility policy) should be easily available to all users of the systems, as a way to communicate with the users what they can expect. See my article Accessibility Statement - What it should include.
    • A simple way to provide feedback should be included on every page of every system, with a specific category of accessibility.
  • Finally a bit of pedantry, i.e. and e.g. are not interchangeable and have been used in the wrong way in several places in the document.

Overall this is an extremely useful document and shows that HMRC are taking the issue very seriously. It would be great to see other public bodies going through a similar process.

Reader Comments

Posted: 6th December 2007 | By Richard Morton :

This does indeed sound encouraging, let's hope that other government departments will learn from this.

I haven't had chance to read the document yet, but one thing does concern me about the process. The online PDF questionnaire is not a form so I can't fill it in online, or even offline without printing it (and as the bottom of the PDF gives the option to email the questionnaire back this begs the question how do I do that?). I appreciate and understand that there is a good accessible online HTML form for responses but why suggest that the PDF can be emailed back if it hasn't been made into a form?

Richard Morton
http://www.qm-consulting.co.uk/

Posted: 10th December 2007 | By Paul Boyd :

Reply to Richard Morton

Richard. Apologies. You are correct. The IT Accessibility Feedback Questionnaire was originally in Word format and could be posted back. Following our recent problems with IT Security the IT Internet team removed the Word document without advising us immediately. As soon as it was brought to our attention we made arrangements to have the PDF document made accessible. Hope this helps. Thanks for keeping us on our toes. Paul Boyd HMRC Business Solutions IT Accesibility Team.

The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.

We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.



  • Report errors / Make Suggestions
  • | Site Map
  • | Terms of Use
  • | Privacy

Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761