Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Peter Abrahams, Practice Leader - Accessibility and Usability, Bloor Research Published: 14th November 2007 Copyright Bloor Research © 2007 |
The winners of the British Computer Society (BCS) Members of Parliament (MP) website awards were announced at a special event in the House of Commons on 7 November. The overall winner was Adam Price MP for Carmarthen East. The other awards went to: Paul Flynn MP - best design, Derek Wyatt MP - engagement and Alan Johnson MP for accessibility. (I have added links to all the relevant sites at the bottom of this blog).
The BCS set this competition up as part of the BCS 50th anniversary celebrations. The intent was to make parliamentarians more aware of the importance of ICT to the UK and in particular the work and influence of the BCS.
The competition also raised the awareness amongst MPs of the power of the web to promote their messages and agenda.
Speaking for the judging panel, Professor Nigel Shadbolt said that standards varied enormously. Some of the worst comments were: "Is he more interested in himself or his voters?", "Wouldn't vote for him.", "Which party does this woman belong to?" and "Self promoting as usual."
Professor Shadbolt added: "Of particular concern was the large number of MP websites that failed to be short-listed because they failed the accessibility test. This means that the large minority of the population with various disabilities would be unable to properly access these sites. And this last category, particularly with an ageing and increasingly IT reliant society, they ignore at their political peril."
"The best were able to combine excellent content with the newest forms of media, such as video and blogging in a bid to get up-to-date, relevant and well-written information out to a cross-section of their constituency."
Accessibility being my particular interest I have had a closer look at the three top sites in this category. I spoke to Abilitynet judge who said that there was a clear winner in this category.
The winner was Alan Johnson. The first thing to notice about this site is the simplicity and clear layout of the home page. It is very easy to see how to get from here to any details. The only sad thing is that the latest news at the time of the competition in November was from July.
The site is all built using XHTML Strict and the checks I run showed that it did conform, which shows that it is perfectly possible to abide by this level of quality. This is a good accessible site but I would still like to make some suggestions for improvement:
Malcolm Bruce was one of the runners-up in this category. In comparison to the winner the home page really has too much content. I really cannot imagine how a screen user can make sense of the page, especially as the header structure only tell a quarter of the story.
Being able to contact the MP is obviously an important function of a web site but I do not think it should be the first link on every page. There is a perfectly good link to a contacts page in the navigation bar. Looking at the contact page brought up an issue around headers. Headers should be primarily a method of navigating around a page and not just a way of formatting text. On the contact page there are two level three headers one for ‘Rosemary Bruce' and one for ‘Diary Office' if you get a listing of headings you would expect these to be two different sections whereas they are one and the same person/function. Again this would be confusing to a screen reader user.
Malcolm's site includes a photo gallery. This is better than others I have seen because it includes more information and background stories to the pictures. It could be even better if there were headers for each picture so you quickly skip through them. I also think that the alt text is misused, it just repeats what is written directly under the picture so a screen reader user will just hear the same thing twice. I think there is a general principle to be learnt here, if the picture is described in detail in the surrounding text then the alt text should just say something like ‘ photo described in text'.
The final accessibility runner-up was Adam Price who also one the overall competition.
Having a Welsh constituency he has a specific accessibility issue that of language, so his home page is very simple with just a link to an English and a Welsh version of the site. As far as I can tell, my Welsh is not very good, all the pages on the site are translated and have the same site map, including the accessibility page. This does not go as far as the external sites for blogs and news. A closer look at the site could suggest ways other sites could support multiple languages.
The site is well laid with an easy to understand structure, with limited information on each page. It has plenty of links to useful external sites.
Category Winner:
Paul Flynn MP http://www.paulflynnmp.co.uk/
Finalists:
Boris Johnson MP http://www.boris-johnson.com/
Mike Wood MP http://www.mikewood.org.uk/
Category Winner:
Derek Wyatt MP http://www.derekwyatt.co.uk/default.aspx
Finalists:
Richard Spring MP http://www.richardspringmp.com/
Tom Brake MP http://www.tombrake.co.uk/
Category Winner:
Alan Johnson MP http://www.alanjohnson.org/
Finalists:
Malcolm Bruce MP http://www.malcolmbruce.org.uk/
Adam Price MP http://www.adamprice.org.uk/
Winner:
Adam Price MP http://www.adamprice.org.uk/
Finalists:
Lynne Featherstone MP http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/
Richard Benyon MP http://www.richardbenyon.com/
Nadine Dorries MP http://www.dorries.org.uk/
Boris Johnson MP http://www.boris-johnson.com/
George Galloway MP http://www.georgegalloway.com/
We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
16th November 2007: 'Richard Morton' said:
In some tests that I ran at the end of 2006 and again in Jan 2007, I ran an automated check against 300 MPs websites (the first 300 in the alphabetical list), and found that only just over one third of them passed the basic priority 1 tests. Of those that did pass, I suspect that a number would fail manual testing at the same priority level, the curently available automatic tests don't do basic things like checking that if there is alt text for an image, it does convey the information seen visually in the image.
Whilst this wasn't a scientific test, I think it is a pretty safe assumption that more than half of our MP's websites would fail the most basic of accessibiltiy levels. Let's not mince words, that means they are breaking the law, which is not a good example to the rest of us subjects.
The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922