Sitewide
RSS Feed:
|
By: Peter Abrahams, Practice Leader - Accessibility and Usability, Bloor Research Published: 29th October 2007 Copyright Bloor Research © 2007 |
Leopard, the new version of the Apple Mac operating system (10.5). arrived today and I have installed it. This blog will be my experiences with it over the next few days, the good, the bad (if any) and the indifferent.
The installation of the upgrade was very straightforward, insert the CD, click a few buttons—all possible without the mouse—and wait over a long lunch, the first stage is checking the installation disk and that took 30 minutes, which was a bit of a surprise, the rest of the installation took about the same time.
After the installation everything was as I had it set up before. Well, not quite everything; crtl+f2 and ctrl+f3 (to get to the blue apple and the hidden dock bar) had both been disabled (which is the default setting).
The first bit of good news is the navigation around the finder tree structures now works the way you would expect it to. If you are in the middle of a folder with lots of files and you press left cursor it takes you to the folder itself and clicking left cursor again closes the folder (just like Windows) Tiger worked differently (I suspect it was a bug) and was a real pain. Unfortunately the other 'bug' in this area is still there. If you want to choose a set of files you cursor key to the first one of interest then holding the shift key press the down cursor key and more files are chosen, unfortunately if you click once too often you would expect to be able to use cursor up to remove the last file; this does not workin fact what happens is that a file is added to the top of the list, which is no use to me at all.
While in finder press the apple button and 4 to see the new Cover Flow feature of Leopard. This shows a flow of thumbnails of the cover pages of each document making it very easy to find the right document, pressing the space-bar expands the thumbnail making it quick and easy to check the document. Page up and page down allow you to scan the whole document. All of this works without a mouse and speeds up the process of finding and looking at files so I think I will consider this an accessibility improvement.
According to Apple the big news for mail is you can change the stationery, this is a nice to have and quite fun but is really just a bit of fluff in comparison to the other changes. The big changes are to-do lists and improved formatting.
In my view the big advance in formatting is the ability to easily create simple and numbered lists in a note, I was trying to do exactly that a few days before Leopard and it was a pain, I had to create the numbers and there was no easy way of getting the list entries to indent properly. With Leopard it is just clicks away (format, lists, insert-) and you have well formatted list and sub lists. There are other things in the formatting which are worth looking at.
The to-do list may revolutionise my life. I can now create a to-do related directly to an email message. So if I send a message asking someone to do something (which I do quite often) I can now set a to-do to chase them in a weeks time, if I have not heard back; at the moment I have to rely on my memory to do that and it does not always work.
I think I will be using this feature a lot but there are some significant accessibility issues. To put it bluntly if the human interface to this feature had been specifically designed to be inaccessible it would not have been much worse. My list of issues is long and detailed so I have put it at the end of this blog.
This is all a real shame because it suggests that Apple do not take accessibility seriously on a continuous basis.
If you click on help the first option you are given is search, if you type in a search term such as copy it will give you a list of copy facilities in the program you are in. If you cursor down to one of these options it will open up the relevant toolbar menus and pressing enter has the same effect as the toolbar entry. This is a very quick way to get to features you do not use very often or you did not know about at all. If a feature has a short-cut key then this is on the toolbar entry, so this is a quick way to learn relevant short-cuts rather than trying to memorise a very long list.
I would add it to my new accessibility features list except that voice over does not read out the entries in the help list. In fact I cannot find out how to get Voice Over to read out any of the help information which is a major accessibility issue.
Some of these new features improve usability and hence accessibility but the failures suggest that accessibility is still not in the DNA of Apple.
Earlier in this article I complained about the inaccessibility of the to-do list function, here is my list of issues:
Nieuw Computer Magazine (NCT) have published a Dutch translation of this posting.
We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
30th October 2007: 'Heart_Man' said:
I work with a blind colleague. He has been beta testing Apple's accessibility features for a long while. The thing I can't believe that is that front line applications like iTunes are barely accessible. With all the audio media potentially available in iTunes, I find it a crime that Apple has neglected iTunes. What a potential gold mine for visually challenged users!
30th December 2007: 'Ricky Buchanan' said:
While it is true that there were major accessibility issues with iTunes for a long time, it's certainly not the case now and hasn't been for a while. There are certain small issues - purchasing entire albums with the iTunes Store is still a problem I believe - but iTunes including podcasts and virtually all functions in the iTunes Store are fully accessible under OS X Tiger and Leopard now.
To say "accessibility is not in Apple's DNA" is to do them a gross misservice. Sure not every programmer at Apple has accessibility in mind, but they are not primarily an access related company - they target general users. Compared with other companies whose primary business is not accessibility, they do wonderfully in virtually every area.
For current information about accessibility with OS X for blind users I suggest http://www.lioncourt.com/ and for general OS X accessibility information I suggest my own http://atmac.org/ - get your information from people with disabilities who use OS X all day every day.
Regards,
Ricky Buchanan
17th December 2007: 'Solid_Snake' said:
Though I don't have Leopard nor use VoiceOver, I find this post to be a rather limited review of 10.5's accessibility features. Granted, Apple undoubtedly needs to address the issues with To-Do Lists and Help, but how can you title your piece "Apple Leopard is more accessible but not good enough" when you only really cover 5 of it's 300+ new features? Many individuals would love to know how Spaces, Time Machine, Stacks, Safari 3.0, iChat 4.0, iCal, and TextEdit stack up accessibility wise, but sadly and confusingly these cornerstones of OS X are not even mentioned. This is much like eating the garnish on a plate, and saying the whole dish tastes awful. Finally, I don't see how one can make the statement "... that accessibility is still not in the DNA of Apple" when, to my knowledge, they were the first company to include a built-in screen reader with a major OS, and provide beneficial support to their committed 3rd party assistive technology developers. In the future, please provide more data to back up your conclusions.
The messages above were all contributed by IT-Director.com readers. Whilst we take care to remove any posts deemed inappropriate, we can take no responsibility for these comments. If you would like a comment removed please contact our editorial team.
Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922